Blog Entry

Team Greatness Rankings

Posted on: January 26, 2011 11:31 pm
  •  
 
I got tired of NFL-Soloman going around with his crappy ass list of franchises so I made my own.  Is it dumb?  Yes.  Do I expect people to agree with me?  Very, very few.  But I did it anyway. 

This is how it works.  The "formula" rewards two things, efficiency at winning championships and consistency.  To figure out the efficiency portion, I divided the total world championships a team has by the total number of seasons a team has played, whether in the NFL or in a different league.  I multiplied that number by 100 and got the team's base number.  For example, the Packers have won 12 championships.  They have played 91 seasons (not including this year because they are still playing).  That comes out to .13186, and then multiplied by 100 it is 13.186.  That was the highest for the efficiency portion.  Now, a world championship, in the case of these rankings, is an NFL Championship prior to the Super Bowl era or a Super Bowl championship.

The consistency portion is a little bit different.  Each team gets a certain amount of points for different factors.  These factors and their point value are as follows: NFL Championship during Super Bowl era and before NFL/AFL merger (.75), non-NFL Championship (.65), conference championship (.5), post-season victories (.3), division championship (.25), and post-season appearence (.2).  I had to do that first one because otherwise it messes up the rankings because the AFL gave out it's own title at the time.  And the NFL Championships from those four seasons are worth more than AFL ones because of the strength of the NFL as a whole as compared tot he AFL.  Adding this all up, you get a second number.  For example, the Cowboys scored highest here with 26.15.  They had 0 NFLChampionships during the Super Bowl era (0 points), 0 non-NFL Championships (0), 10 conference championships (5), 33 post-season wins (9.9), 21 division championships (5.25), and 30 post-season appearences (6).  Other than those first two categories, they were number 1 in everyhting except conference championships, where they were 2.  Add that to the fact that they have been around 51 seasons, far fewer than many of the other teams, they have proven to be the most consistent team when it comes to contending for a title.

The final number is derived from adding the two numbers together.  Take the Packers and Cowboys for example.  The packers scored 13.186 on the efficiency portion, the only team over 10.  But, they haven't been as consistent as some teams and only scored a 22.35 on the consistency portion.  Their total number is 35.536.  The Cowboys had the third highest efficiency score with 9.804.  But, as said, they had the highest consistency score at 26.15.  That gives them a total of 35.954.

Now I know one big complaint is going to be rewarding less for world championships and it is not fair, but that is not the case.  Teams like the Packers and Bears, who won a majority of their titles before the Super Bowl era, had much easier roads to go through since they only had to play one post-season game, the championship game.  teams who have had a great deal of success in the Super Bowl era, such as the Cowboys, will benefit from that because they had tougher roads to travel to attain those championships.

Another complaint will be biaism.  I tried not to do that, but 100% objectivity is an impossible goal.  Take these rankings for example, I have more respect for a Super Bowl championship than I do for ones that came before that era because of the higher degree of difficulty.  Why?  Probably because my team has had basically all of their success in that area.  And that claim will be magnified when looking at the rankings, but I honest to God, didn't know how they would turn out and was in fact surprised, happily I admit, to see who was on top.

Now, I may have made mistakes when adding the numbers and doing all the math, in fact I'm sure I did.  And if someone points that out to me i will gladly correct that mistake or mistakes.  So here they are:


Team

World Championships

NFL Championships (Super Bowl Era) (.75)

Non-NFL Championships (.65)

Conference Championships (.5)

Post-Season Wins (.3)

Divisional Championships (.25)

Post-Season Appearences (.2)

Total

Cowboys

9.804

0

0

5

9.9

5.25

6

35.954

Packers

13.186

1.5

0

4

8.4

3.25

5.2

35.536

Steelers

7.792

0

0

4

9.9

5

5.2

31.892

Giants

8.139

0

0

5

6

3.75

6

28.889

Browns

6.153

0

2.6

5.5

4.8

3.25

5.6

27.903

49ers

7.692

0

0

2.5

8.1

4.25

4.6

27.142

Bears

9.89

0

0

2

5.1

4.5

5.2

26.69

Colts

6.896

0.75

0

3.5

5.7

3.5

4.8

25.146

Raiders

5.882

0

0.65

2

7.5

3.75

4.2

23.982

Redskins

6.329

0

0.65

2.5

6.9

3

4.4

23.779

Rams

4

0

0

3

5.7

3.75

5.4

21.85

Patriots

5.882

0

0

3

6.3

3.25

3.4

21.832

Dolphins

4.444

0

0

2.5

6

3.25

4.4

20.594

Broncos

3.921

0

0

3

5.1

2.5

5.4

19.921

Eagles

3.846

0

0

1.5

5.7

2.75

4.6

18.396

Vikings

0

0.75

0

2

5.7

4.5

5.2

18.15

Bills

0

0

1.3

2

4.2

2.5

3.4

13.4

Lions

4.938

0

0

2

2.1

1

2.8

12.838

Titans

0

0

1.3

0.5

4.2

2.25

4.2

12.45

Ravens

6.667

0

0

0.5

2.7

0.5

1.4

11.767

Chiefs

1.961

0

1.95

0

2.4

2

3.2

11.511

Chargers

0

0

0.65

0.5

3

3.75

3.4

11.3

Jets

1.961

0

0.65

0

3.6

1

2.8

10.011

Buccaneers

2.857

0

0

0.5

1.8

1.5

2

8.657

Cardinals

2.197

0

0

0.5

1.8

1.5

1.6

7.597

Saints

2.272

0

0

0.5

1.5

1

1.6

6.872

Seahawks

0

0

0

0.5

2.4

1.75

2.2

6.85

Bengals

0

0

0

1

1.5

1.75

1.4

5.65

Falcons

0

0

0

0.5

1.8

1

2

5.3

Panthers

0

0

0

0.5

1.8

0.75

0.8

3.85

Jaguars

0

0

0

0

1.5

0.5

1.2

3.2

Texans

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 


  •  
Comments

Since: Oct 9, 2006
Posted on: June 28, 2011 10:46 am
 

Team Greatness Rankings


1. (36.78, up from 35.536)
2. (35.954)
3. (31.792, down from 31.892)
4. (28.889)
5. (27.903)
6. (27.142)
7. (26.690)
8. (25.146)
9. (23.982)
10. (23.779)
11. (21.850)
12. (21.832)
13. (20.594)
14. (19.921)
15. (18.396)
16. (18.150)
17. (13.400)
18. (12.838)
19. (12.450)
20. (11.767)
21. (11.511)
22. (11.300)
23. (10.011)
24. (8.657)
25. (7.597)
26. (6.872)
27. (6.850)
28. (5.650)
29. (5.300)
30. (3.850)
31. (3.2)
32. (0.000)




Since: Dec 10, 2009
Posted on: January 31, 2011 10:05 am
 

Team Greatness Rankings

Dude, next time you're high, do something productive like watch an old episode of the Super Friends, and save us all from reading this slop



Since: Jun 28, 2007
Posted on: January 28, 2011 1:44 pm
 

Team Greatness Rankings

I can dig it...



Since: Oct 9, 2006
Posted on: January 27, 2011 12:10 am
 

Team Greatness Rankings

Oh, one more thing.  Sol is a fat retard.



Since: Oct 9, 2006
Posted on: January 27, 2011 12:09 am
 

Team Greatness Rankings

And one more thing before I smoke this bowl and play some Call of Duty, here are the division rnkings based on averages.

1. NFC East (26.745)
2. NFC North (23.2035)
3. AFC North (19.303)
4. AFC West (16.6785)
5. AFC East (16.45925)
6. NFC West (15.85975)
7. AFC South (10.199)
8. NFC South (6.16975)

I would like to point out, again, just how bad the NFC South has been.  Look at the botton two divisions.  Both the the NFC and AFC South.  The AFC South has two teams with no titles and have been in existence less than 17 years.  As a total the division has four World Championships.  And one of the teams, the Texans, scored zeroes across the board.  The NFC South has three teams that have been around for more than 30 years, and the other just played their 17th season.  They have a total of 2 world championships.  And yet, the AFC South is over 10 on average and the NFC South barely cracks 6.



Since: Oct 9, 2006
Posted on: January 26, 2011 11:52 pm
 

Team Greatness Rankings

A few things that surprised me:

1. The Cowboys at the top spot.  I truly did not expect that.  Sure, i knew they'd be close up, but I hadn't realized just how much they've done, especially when comparing them to teams that have been around almost twice as long.

2. The Browns being so high.  I knew they had a little bit of a history, but man, for a team that has no Super Bowl rings, they are way high.  In fact, they are the only team in the top 14 without a Super Bowl title.

3. Just how bad the NFC South has been historicaly.  All four teams from the division are in the bottom 9 of the rankings.

And a couple of things to note.  This list includes the 2010-11 season for all teams except the Packers and Steelers since they are still playing when figuring out their efficiency rating.  Basically, this is their 92nd and 78th season, respectfully, but it wouldn't be fair to punish them for not winning championships in seasons that they still have a chance to.  Now, their accomplishments this season for the consistency number is still there since those are based off totals and not percentages.



Since: Oct 9, 2006
Posted on: January 26, 2011 11:43 pm
 

Team Greatness Rankings

Well, that didn't work out quite right.  Here are just the rankings with the team name and total score.

1. Cowboys (35.954)
2. Packers (35.536)
3. Steelers (31.892)
4. Giants (28.889)
5. Browns (27.903)
6. 49ers (27.142)
7. Bears (26.690)
8. Colts (25.146)
9. Raiders (23.982)
10. Redskins (23.779)
11. Rams (21.850)
12. Patriots (21.832)
13. Dolphins (20.594)
14. Broncos (19.921)
15. Eagles (18.396)
16. Vikings (18.150)
17. Bills (13.400)
18. Lions (12.838)
19. Titans (12.450)
20. Ravens (11.767)
21. Chiefs (11.511)
22. Chargers (11.300)
23. Jets (10.011)
24. Buccaneers (8.657)
25. Cardinals (7.597)
26. Saints (6.872)
27. Seahawks (6.850)
28. Bengals (5.650)
29. Falcons (5.300)
30. Panthers (3.850)
31. Jaguars (3.2)
32. Texans (0.000)

All the other numbers making up the final score can be found in the original post.  Like I said, I don't expect people to agree with me, I just thought it would be fun.  Plus I was high.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com