Blog Entry

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

Posted on: December 11, 2011 5:00 pm
Edited on: December 11, 2011 6:31 pm
  •  
 
Posted by Royce Young



More people might be wondering how Khloe Kardashian feels about Dallas than what Lamar Odom means for the defending champs. But that's just the way it is when it comes to Odom.

So let's ask the question: How does Khloe feel about this?

Just kidding. I meant the other question.

The Mavericks needed to replace the size they lost with Tyson Chandler signing with the Knicks and while Brendan Haywood is a serviceable replacement -- especially in terms of what he's already being paid -- Odom gives the Mavs a jolt of size, which is something they definitely needed.

I mean, just imagine the options Rick Carlisle has now. Odom and Dirk together in the frontcourt, Odom at small forward, Odom running point forward with Jason Kidd off the ball and two other guards or just Odom at the 5 and Dirk at the 4.

It was a bit curious to me that the Lakers would be so willing to unload Odom to the team that swept them out of the playoffs last season, especially when the deal helps their foe in a lot of ways. Because look at what Odom gives Dallas: A big body to rebound and defend the size in the West -- i.e., the Lakers with Gasol and Bynum (or Dwight Howard) -- but also another offensive weapon that can play inside and out.

How do you defend the Mavs with both Odom and Dirk together? That's got to be one of the more unique pairings that anyone in the league could deploy. Dirk's off-balance jumpers, Odom's passing and ball-handling -- two unconventional players playing in a very dynamic offensive system with a point guard like Jason Kidd passing them the ball. That could be some poetic offense.

A big question is, is this enough to make the Mavs contenders to repeat? Chandler meant so very much to them in terms of protecting the paint and Odom isn't replacing that. He's more giving them a little more offensive versatility while also a little bump in size. If we were just comparing Odom to losing Chandler, there's no comparison. The Mavs lost more than they gained.

But Odom isn't there to replace Chandler. He's there to give the Mavs a new look. It's more about Haywood and what he brings. Because if he's capable of turning in a season like he had in Washginton before signing a big deal with Dallas, you're looking at a Mavs team that's similar to last season except they've just added Lamar Odom. Sounds like an upgrade to me.

And what did they have to give up? Just a trade exception that they got a few hours earlier from the Chandler deal. Dan Gilbert has had the trade exception the Cavs got in their sign-and-trade with Miami for LeBron. Mark Cuban and Donnie Nelson turned theirs into Lamar Odom and it only took about 12 hours.

Maybe it was part of a master plan, or maybe it's just coincidence, but partly because of Mark Cuban's noise-making, the Mavericks just landed themselves a pretty nice piece for very little. Are they still championship material? It's a different look now because Odom is going to change them a lot. Without him, they'd be more of the same with Haywood trying to do his best Tyson Chandler impersonation. Now, they've got a fresh, versatile face that might make them as dangerous as they've ever been offensively.
  •  
Comments

Since: Sep 7, 2006
Posted on: December 13, 2011 1:56 am
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

GayeuxSaints12

Crying hypocrite?
How'd he buy a chapmionship last season?
By adding cast-off old guys no-one wanted but now all of a sudden everyone wants Chandler, Butler, Barea.

I don't see that as buying a chapmionship.




Wouldn't you rather have Cuban for your cute little Hornets? At least yal would have a say in anything. Oh wait yal do, Stern owns yal!
Quit blowing your whistle! 



Since: Jan 6, 2009
Posted on: December 12, 2011 6:55 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

How's it look? I'll tell you how it looks, it looks like a spoiled crying hypocrite got his wish after complaining to anyone who would listen in reference to the Hornets/Laker trade. Cubano couldn't wait to get Odom, he'll try and buy Title # 2 anyway he can. Considering he is in the same division as the Hornets and Rockets, he should be the last person to say a word. No Gasol in Houston either. Stern should wear a rubber next time he decides to **** the Hornets again, that spineless slug!!!



Since: Apr 1, 2007
Posted on: December 12, 2011 5:22 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

"I for the life of me just can't understand at all how this benifitted the Lakers?"

Probably an order from Stern to appease Cuban and Gilbert. Probably also came with the caveat he'd nix all future deals for Paul so the Lakers could sign him as a free agent when he walks from NO after the season.




Since: Mar 30, 2008
Posted on: December 12, 2011 4:49 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

I for the life of me just can't understand at all how this benifitted the Lakers?



Since: Oct 23, 2006
Posted on: December 12, 2011 2:12 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

This is probably the best the Mavericks could do after losing Chandler.

I am still not sure how they let Chandler leave as he was the diffrence maker they needed.

The biggest issue is that Odom plays the same kind of wandering game as Dirk.  They will have size, but it is not that low post size.

Odom softens the blow a little bit, but it will be tough for Dallas to repeat if they are pinning their hopes on Haywood.



Since: Sep 29, 2011
Posted on: December 12, 2011 1:19 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

I like the move and I'm glad Mark Cuban and Donnie Nelson are working some deals for the Mavericks now.  While Lamar Odom doens't replace the defensive void left by Tyson Chandler...it probably boosts our offense to hopefully at least out score oppenents when we can't shut them down...LOL.

Just keep the in-laws away from Dallas Lamar...we don't need Dirk distracted by Kim!



Since: May 27, 2011
Posted on: December 12, 2011 12:47 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

I do believe that Mr.Bryant will look out for his buddy,Lamar at the Kardashian home.



Since: Oct 14, 2010
Posted on: December 12, 2011 12:12 pm
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

I like the Odom deal.  As for Khloe, more distance from the Kardashian Klan won't hurt.  She won't have to see her little half-sisters turn into bigger tramps than Kim and Kourtney ever dreamed of.



Since: Sep 7, 2006
Posted on: December 12, 2011 11:49 am
 

Lamar Odom and the Mavs: How's it look?

In my honest opinion, I think the Chris Paul trade was nixed because too many players were going to be switching cities.

How are you going to trade Chris Paul for Lamar Odom, Pau Gasol, Kevin Martin, and Luis Scola, oh yeah and some cash.



That isn't very fair in my opinion compared to trading a guy who asked for a trade and you trade him for draft picks.

I understand the outcry's over this Paul trade but look at it from a business perspective! HAHA

Chris Paul's salary 2012 $16,359,805

Pau Gasol $18,714,150
Lamar Odom $8,900,000
Kevin Martin $12,019,840
Luis Scola $8,591,793

So you're sending...
$16,359,805 to the Lakers
$18,714,150 to the Rockets
$29,511,633 to the Hornets



Make sense why they nixed this trade?
NBA helped itself, just like all of us would do. 


nfflikeme
Since: Dec 12, 2011
Posted on: December 12, 2011 11:21 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator



The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com