Blog Entry

Sports law expert: NBA season can still be saved

Posted on: November 14, 2011 11:00 pm
Edited on: November 15, 2011 12:27 am
  •  
 
Posted by Ben Gollivernba-lockout

On Monday, the National Basketball Players Association sent the NBA a disclaimer of interest, folding up the union and turning the keys over to lawyers. It was a move that NBPA executive director Billy Hunter admitted would lead to a "high probability" that the 2011-2012 season, and NBA commissioner David Stern replied to the action by saying that the league was headed for a "nuclear winter."

But all hope is not lost.

Sports law expert and Tulane professor Gabe Feldman told the Orlando Sentinel that the legal process the NBPA is heading for could be wrapped up quickly enough to save at least some portion of the 2011-2012 regular season, which has already seen its first six weeks canceled.
OS: So is the ultimate upshot here that a season is now much less likely after today’s events?

I don’t know that it’s “much less likely.” I just think that the upshot here is that the players have taken a significant step to try to gain leverage at the bargaining table and the upshot is that the season will certainly not start as quickly as it would have without the disclaimer.

But it doesn’t mean that the season won’t happen. I think a much more shortened season is an inevitability at this point. But the litigation process could take place quickly enough to allow the players and the owners to determine how much leverage they have. It wouldn’t mean an entire antitrust lawsuit is litigated because that could take years. But the preliminary fights could take place in a manner of weeks and could be resolved in time to save part of the regular season.

Folks have discussed this as the “nuclear option,” and David Stern himself has said we’re in for a “nuclear winter.” It’s not irreparable harm here. They can put the pieces back together in time to save the season.
NBA commissioner David Stern labeled the disclaimer a "negotiating tactic" in his Monday morning address, so everyone seems to agree that it's a move with legal as well as posturing implications.

But when will the legal stuff start playing out? That remains an open question.

David Boies, new counsel for the NBA players, said Monday that no official lawsuit had yet been filed and seemed to imply, in a question and answer session with ESPN.com, that there might not be one forthcoming.
If -- and I say if because first of all, we haven't filed a lawsuit -- a lawsuit were filed, but if a lawsuit were filed and if there was an interest in settling that lawsuit, then as Jeffrey says, what would happen is the lawyers for the players would meet the lawyers for the owners and we would try to come up with some kind of settlement. 

That settlement would be something that would open up the league to play. But you would not have a collective bargaining solution. 
In other words, we all sit and wait until the players make this thing official. Our lockout purgatory is now in a purgatory of its own. Exponential legal purgatory is about as far from basketball as one can imagine and as deflating as it gets.
  •  
Comments
tianyougo
Since: Nov 15, 2011
Posted on: November 15, 2011 11:46 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Oct 6, 2006
Posted on: November 15, 2011 11:13 am
 

Sports law expert: NBA season can still be saved

Just cancel the freaking season and keep it that way. The model is broken. Stop trying to come up with quick fixes for a system that won't work in the long run. Besides, it's really no big loss, we've got football, hockey, and the premier league which are all much better products anyway.



Since: Aug 25, 2011
Posted on: November 14, 2011 11:32 pm
 

Sports law expert: NBA season can still be saved

Problem is Stern looks at everything as a negotiating tactic, from his chest thumping, ultimatum setting, bullying, finger pointing at the players. What he is yet to realize is that if the court agrees with the players and salary cap setting and many, many other practices that the owners engage in, are in violation of anti-trust laws, is that the players will be much better off without the union. The owners will not be able to use that as leverage against the players and most of all Stern wil be out of a job. So this is nuclear winter for Stern.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com