Blog Entry

NBA Playoffs Mavericks-Blazers: 3 surprises

Posted on: April 17, 2011 2:26 am
Edited on: April 17, 2011 2:45 am
The Dallas Mavericks defeated the Portland Trail Blazers in Game 1 of their first round NBA Playoffs series. Posted by Ben Golliver.

Stop me if you've heard this one before: Dallas Mavericks All-Star forward Dirk Nowitzki won a home playoff game by parading to the free throw line in the fourth quarter. Nowitzki's 13-13 performance at the stripe in the final quarter -- 12 minutes of perfection that sealed Dallas' 89-81 Game 1 victory over the Portland Trail Blazers -- was a familiar ending, but there were plenty of surprises that preceded it. 

By virtue of being one of the most evenly matched series, Blazers-Mavericks was also one of the most scrutized. Here's three game-changing factors that nobody saw coming.

1. Jason Kidd explodes from deep

Everyone assumed that Mavericks point guard Jason Kidd would step up his production above the numbers he put up during the season series against the Blazers. Twice in four games, Kidd failed to make a shot and he averaged less than five points a game over the four meetings between the two teams.

On Saturday, the Blazers simply lost track of him time and time again and he bombed away eagerly. Whether he was open in semi-transition, open because of slow rotation, open because Blazers guards went under high picks, one thing was for sure: Kidd was open. When the dust settled, he finished with 24 points on 6-10 from downtown. That's the most points Kidd has scored in a game in more than a year -- since April 3, 2010 -- and tied for the most three-pointers he's made this season. Talk about the perfect time to show up.

It's unlikely Kidd will have another explosion like this, but he probably won't need to. In Dallas' balanced scoring attack there are plenty of other offensive options who can put up bigger numbers than they did in Game 1. Jason Terry, in particular, is due for a game in which he gets more than five shots and 10 points (half of those coming on fourth quarter free throws) as he's also struggled against Portland this season. JJ Barea (1-7), Peja Stojakovic (2-7) and DeShawn Stevenson (2-4) are all also capable of more. Kidd, in a sense, called his own number tonight because it was required, especially with Nowitzki struggling with his efficency early in the game. Look for order and scoring balance to be restored as this series continues. 

More on Blazers at Mavs
Related links
2. Brandon Roy plays down the stretch
The most head-scratching coaching decision of this game -- and arguably of Portland's season -- came when Nate McMillan opted to play guard Brandon Roy the entire fourth quarter instead of starting guard Wesley Matthews, fellow reserve Rudy Fernandez or center Marcus Camby.

Just once in the last month has Roy played more than 26 minutes -- a recent home win over the Lakers -- and nothing about his recent play suggests he should be playing the crunch time minutes in this series. Roy shot just 33% from the field in April and has looked tentative with the ball in his hands and reluctant to shoot. To be blunt, he's a half-step slow and regularly over-thinking; reactive rather than proactive. The role he's filled has been that of a drive-and-kick facilitator, yet his speed and quickness with the ball in his hands has not recovered from his most recent knee surgeries and he doesn't draw the off-ball attention he once did. The result on Saturday was a bogged down late-game offense that failed to generate free throws or clean looks and allowed Dallas to make a major run late in the final quarter.

What's even more confusing, though, is that McMillan has almost always turned to Matthews late in games when the Blazers have held the lead. Portland led 72-66 with less than six minutes to go, the perfect situation to swap Roy for Matthews and slam the door shut. Not only is Matthews a superior defender, he's also a superior outside shooter (Matthews has shot 40.7% from deep this season while Roy has shot 33.3%). As a team, Portland shot 2-16 from deep on the night , including 1-7 in the final quarter. While Matthews struggled early with turnovers, he certainly has shown this season that he deserves more than 19 minutes and three shots. If Matthews wasn't such a nice guy and team player, he should be seething.

Even if McMillan decided Matthews simply didn't have it going in the pressure-packed situation that is Game 1, he had other options. Rudy Fernandez, although not a true impact player on Saturday, had six points, two rebounds and one assist in 18 minutes. If not Fernandez, then going back to a larger lineup -- with Marcus Camby in the middle -- would have been another option. While that would likely have led to easier double teams and more congestion for LaMarcus Aldridge -- who was excellent on the evening, finishing with 27 points and six boards -- Camby, who 18 rebounds in 29 minutes, would have been a difference-maker on the boards late, as Dallas center Tyson Chandler's four fourth-quarter rebounds were huge in extending Dallas possessions and ending Portland possessions.

Really, the late-game strategy should have been simple: Anybody But Roy. He finished 1-7 on the evening for two points and played exactly how recent history suggested he would play: flat, late and not in tune with a flowing offensive team concept. What's more, McMillan's decision was a departure from his usual rotation, necessitating an adjustment from all of Roy's teammates. Why did he do it? And, more importantly, why now? 

3. Gerald Wallace is virtually invisble

Publication after publication touted Blazers forward Gerald Wallace as the X-factor in this series for plenty of good reasons: his defensive versatility, his array of offensive skills, his veteran leadership and his combination of experience and toughness. Wallace has told reporters in recent weeks that he's settled into his surroundings after some initial nervousness following a midseason trade that sent him from the Charlotte Bobcats to the Blazers. Tonight, we didn't see that.

Wallace was as invisible as he has been in a month, shooting a jittery 4-13 from the field, committing three turnovers and scoring just eight points and five rebounds in 38 minutes. To find a performance from Wallace that was that lacking, you have to go all the way back to March 15 which, incidentally, was a game against the Dallas Mavericks. That's an immediate red flag for Portland's upset hopes.

Wallace is McMillan's jack-of-all-trades, a player who is surely capable of defending multiple positions. But, on the offensive end, he struggled to find space against Dallas' veteran defense, a group that played a motivated and intelligent game all-around from start to finish. Dallas focused most of its team energy on Aldridge, and Wallace couldn't quite find the correct spacing and timing to get the points Portland needs from him. His ineffectiveness was arguably systematic, as this was a low-scoring, fairly ugly game in which Portland never found a solid offensive rhythm (except for Aldridge). Wallace surely has better nights in him, just as Portland's offense does. A few more made three-pointers from deep and everything else will open up. Wallace should be a key beneficiary.

Since: Sep 3, 2006
Posted on: April 18, 2011 12:16 pm

NBA Playoffs Mavericks-Blazers: 3 surprises

A lot has been said about the FT differential ... which by the way the was even through 3 quarters.  Bottom line was that the Mavericks got into the bonus early in the fourth and then Nowitzki did exactly what he is supposed to do ... drive the ball to the basket get fouled and hit free throws.  The Blazers simply didn't match the Mavericks aggressiveness in making the plays that get foul calls.  Instead, they settled for jumpshots.  Could there have been a couple more calls for Portland?  Sure.  But the game was won by eight points. 

To me, the bigger story is that there were only a total of 21 free throws awarded to both teams through 3 quarters.  Clearly the refs were letting them play, which one would think would be advantage Blazers.  Yet the Blazers failed to expose the Mavs supposed softness. 

Unlike the Blazers-Rockets series, where McMillen made a very specific complaint about foul calls on his bigs.  This time the complaint McMillan made was more general.  More often than not, this is a mistake as the refs don't really make an adjustment but the players start to think they are being victimized.  This is something that Mav fans know all too well. 

To me, the biggest surprise in game 1 was Jason Kidd's assertiveness ... shot hunting as the announcers put it.  That's something that we haven't seen all year, yet was clearly part of the Mavs game plan.  I believe the Mavs are finally coming to the realization that they can't count on Jason Terry or Rodrigue Beabois to score ... plus Marion and Wallace are likely to cancel each other out.  So the only other options are to get more scoring from Kidd and Chandler.

The biggest non-surprise?  Dirk Nowitzki doing what superstars do ... win playoff games for his team.  Maybe we'll see the same from LaMarcus Aldridge in this series, but until then Blazer fans will know what it looks like.

Since: Aug 3, 2007
Posted on: April 17, 2011 10:25 pm

NBA Playoffs Mavericks-Blazers: 3 surprises

I think the biggest surprise for me was Roy being in there in crunch time. This is exactly why I questioned giving McMillan that extension so early. It's the playoffs, and Nate suddenly seems to think that Roy is the star player again. Roy can still be a useful player because he does have that assassin's mentality, but he really is strictly a jump shooter. The lineup down the stretch, protecting a lead, should have been Camby, Aldridge, Wallace, Batum or Matthews, and Miller.

Nate has been significantly outcoached in each of the Blazers last two playoff series, but it has been somewhat masked by the fact the Blazers were also rather shorthanded last year, and just inexperienced the year before that.  He is very well respected around the league, and has done his best coaching this season, finally getting creative with his lineups and offensive sets. Brandon's injury had a part in that, and its a shame he doesn't keep with that in the playoffs.

Wallace will be fine. He seemed tight to me, but now that he has the game under his belt, I expect him to cut loose in game 2.

Since: Dec 5, 2006
Posted on: April 17, 2011 5:06 pm

NBA Playoffs Mavericks-Blazers: 3 surprises

Good review, Ben of an ugly game. I am not sure, however, that these were all surprises. Using a defense designed to leave Jason Kidd open is, as you said, a reasonable risk as his shooting has fallen off of late. He is a 36% shooter on the year and 34% from three. Leaving Dirk one-on-one while staying with Jason might be more surprising.

Brandon Roy is a shell of the player we watched in his first 5 years. It is not the most recent knee surgeries that have taken his star. He began to lose it last year just before the playoffs when Ron Artest reached out and stepped on the foot of the cutting Roy, ending his season with another knee injury. Watching that deliberate act in slow motion is gut-wrenching. Brandon is not likely to be a factor for this playoff series. Brandon was not playing, most of his time, in replacement of Matthews but of Miller who is also a terrible defender and a poor outside shooter. Brandon is still an adept passer. That said Marcus Camby was the needed factor as the Mavericks went big and Portland could stop them from rebounding.

Gerald Wallace must be strongly predictible as he endured 4 of his 9 misses as shots blocked. Put those in the basket instead and Wallace had 8 for 13 for 16 points and 5 rebounds and 3 steals - definitely a factor. Wallace is a new player for the Blazers and now has fewer shots than he is used to because he is surrounded by solid talent for the first time in his career. Dallas scouted him well and he can now use these few days until game 2 to revise his tendancies and perhaps be a more significant scorer in future games. Wallace is one of few Blazers who can get his own shot.

A forth surprising factor in the game was the significant difference in foul shots awarded each team. Were the Blazers really that passive to only earn 13 shots for the game and especially only two in the 4th quarter? Was Dallas really that agressive and better in drawing 29 foul shots for the game and 19 in the 4th quarter? That has got to change for Portland to have a fair opportunity for the upset. It will be interesting to see what happens in Game 2. I am mindful of the many times fans have accused the NBA of deciding games by the assignment of referees to a game. In this case the Blazers should first blame themselves for letting the referees control the game. All those missed shots in the fourth quarter were not referees, although the foul calling might have influenced the shots they took. Good teams overcome adversity in whatever form. The Blazers have to decide if they are a good team.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or